![Comparing Prices and Performance: Are Elite Artificebot Prompts Economically Sensible?](https://thmb.techidaily.com/0fabbd6ca39e068e6ff5a1dc76e09f39c4c023b261fbe4ba782432860cba0bd7.jpg)
Comparing Prices and Performance: Are Elite Artificebot Prompts Economically Sensible?
![](/images/site-logo.png)
After all the speculation and claims regarding the abilities of GPT-4, the much anticipated fourth iteration of the GPT family of language models launched on March 14, 2023.
GPT-4 didn’t come with some of the much-touted features it was rumored to have. However, the latest model significantly improves on GPT-3.5 and its predecessors. But how is GPT-4 different from GPT-3.5? We’ll take you through some key differences between GPT-4 and GPT-3.5.
1. GPT-4 vs. GPT-3.5: Creativity
However, GPT-4 raises the bar even further. Although GPT-4’s creative advantage may not be apparent when trying to solve basic problems, the difference in creativity between both models becomes apparent as the task becomes harder and requires a higher level of creativity.
For example, if you ask both models to complete a creative task like writing a poem using both English and French on each line of the poem,ChatGPT powered by the latest GPT-4 model will deliver better results. While GPT-4’s response would use both languages on every line, GPT-3.5 would alternate between both languages instead, with each line using one language and the next using the other.
2. GPT-4 vs. GPT-3.5: Image or Visual Inputs
While GPT-3.5 can only accept text prompts, GPT-4 is multi-modal and can accept both text and visual inputs. To be clear, when we say visual inputs, the image doesn’t have to be an image of a typed prompt—it can be an image of anything. So from an image of a handwritten math problem to Reddit memes, GPT-4 can understand and describe almost any image.
Unlike GPT-3, GPT-4 is both a language and a visual model.
During the GPT-4 announcement live stream, an OpenAI engineer fed the model with a screenshot of a Discord server. GPT-4 could describe every detail on it, including the names of users online at the time. An image of a hand-drawn mockup of a joke website was also fed to the model with instructions to turn it into a website, and amazingly, GPT-4 provided a working code for a website that matched the image.
With GPT-4, most safety measures are already baked into the system at the model level. To understand the difference, it’s like building a house with robust materials from the get-go versus using anything that goes and then trying to patch things as faults emerge. According toOpenAI’s GPT-4 technical report [PDF], GPT-4 produces toxic responses only 0.73% of the time compared to GPT-3.5’s 6.48% of toxic replies.
One of GPT-3.5’s flaws is its tendency to produce nonsensical and untruthful information confidently. In AI lingo, this is called “AI hallucination” and can cause distrust of AI-generated information.
In GPT-4, hallucination is still a problem. However, according to the GPT-4 technical report, the new model is 19% to 29% less likely to hallucinate when compared to the GPT-3.5 model. But this isn’t just about the technical report. Responses from the GPT-4 model on ChatGPT are noticeably more factual.
5. GPT-4 vs. GPT-3.5: Context Window
A less talked about difference between GPT-4 and GPT-3.5 is the context window and context size. A context window is how much data a model can retain in its “memory” during a chat session and for how long. GPT-4 has a significantly better context size and window than its predecessor model.
In practical terms, this means that GPT-4 can better remember the context of a conversation for longer, as well as the instructions given during the conversation.
An issue with GPT-3.5 is the propensity of the model to go off-topic or fail to follow instructions as you progress during the course of a conversation. You could, for instance, tell the model to address you by your name, and it would do so for a while but then fail to follow the instructions along the way. Although this problem still exists with the GPT-4 model, it is less of an issue because of a better context window.
Another issue is the limitation on the volume of text you can use in a prompt at once. Summarizing long text using GPT-3 typically means splitting the text into multiple chunks and summarizing them bit by bit. The improvement in context length in the GPT-4 model means you can paste entire PDFs at a go and get the model to summarize without splitting it into chunks.
Undoubtedly, GPT-4 is a significant step up from its predecessor models. While it is still plagued with some of the limitations of GPT-3.5, significant improvements in several areas and the addition of new capabilities make the model an exciting new step in the pursuit of truly intelligent AI language models.
- Title: Comparing Prices and Performance: Are Elite Artificebot Prompts Economically Sensible?
- Author: Frank
- Created at : 2024-09-05 12:46:59
- Updated at : 2024-09-06 12:46:59
- Link: https://tech-revival.techidaily.com/comparing-prices-and-performance-are-elite-artificebot-prompts-economically-sensible/
- License: This work is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.